John Edwards: Street Fighter

Every once in while, in my roaming and readings I come across interesting articles and blogs that should be highlighted. I think at least. Today, I read two referencing Edwards fighting theme.

Hope 'n Hell

Anyway, on to the articles...

The first one comes from TNR, made me laugh.

John Edwards Will Kick Your  Ass

Knoxville, Iowa

It's been two weeks since I last attended an Edwards event, and I immediately noticed something new: For some reason he was wearing a smart-looking suit and tie last night rather than his usual blazer and blue jeans combo. Maybe just another sign we're getting down to business here...

snip

Later on, Edwards told a pretty powerful story about a woman who was recently denied coverage for a liver transplant. The doctors and nurses at her hospital complained to the insurance company, and then ordinary "Americans" said enough and started picketing the insurer themselves. Finally, the company backed down and agreed to cover the transplant. But it was too late; the woman died a few hours later. "People say to me, 'As president of the United States, I want you to sit at a table and negotiate with these people?'" Edwards groaned. "Never. I will never do it." Again, it seemed like a shot at Obama.

An aide assures me that Edwards is still pressing the case against Hillary as hard as ever--that she's basically the target of all the corporate lobbyist talk, and the emphasis on the need to change Washington. Fair enough. But the allusions to Obama's idea are unquestionably new. (For what it's worth, the feelings seem to be mutual. Obama spent a lot of time deriding Edwards's overly-angry approach in the speech I caught Friday.)

One final wrinkle from last night: Edwards's rhetoric about being a fighter has suddenly become very literal. He's always talked about fighting corporate interests in Washington and in the court room as a trial lawyer. Last night there was this: "I grew up in some rough neighborhoods ... I remember when I was young, I got into a fight ... went home. My father said, 'Listen to me.' He said, 'I don't want to hear about you starting any fights.' I said, 'Yes, sir.' And he said, 'Listen to me very carefully. You don't start a fight, but you never, ever walk away from one.' ... And so I fought. I fought with everything I had. Didn't win all the time, but I won some. And I survived."

If you follow Edwards long enough, you notice that, in subtle ways, he has the bearing and even the swagger of a jock (which he actually was--and a pretty successful one at that). I think this is the closest to the surface I've ever seen it, though. It's like Edwards is saying to lobbyists: Don't mess with me, because I will kick your ass. Really.  

Even the one comment from that blog made me chuckle.

The Ignorant Populist said:
Get stuck in John!

He's a streetbrawler, fist fighting evil corporations for the little man.

Obama will invite the bad guys around for tea and ask them to stop being bad. Hillary will look for donations from the bad guys so she can set up a think tank that will delay any verdict on the bad guys, as long as they keep donating. Johnboy will punch them in the windpipe, knee them in the balls then take their wallets and hand out 100 dollar bills to the poor.

Get stuck in John!  

The next article comes from the Washington Post, the Trail.

Edwards Fights to the Finish

DES MOINES -- For the final days in the Iowa contest, John Edwards has shed his blue jeans and open-collar shirt and put on a suit and tie -- and a pair of brass knuckles.

Often the forgotten man in Iowa's three-way Democratic battle, Edwards is on the move. Independent analysts see his support firming up. Advisers to both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama believe he might win the caucuses on Thursday -- although their views should be discounted because both Clinton and Obama would rather see Edwards win if they can't.

snip

Nobody in the race here understands the rhythms of campaigns any better than Edwards and nobody is more ruthlessly focused on closing the deal than the former trial lawyer and senator. This time he's trying to make it all the way, knowing that he cannot afford to lose here on Thursday night.
But it is his message that is most remarkable. No thought here of finishing on a sunny and positive note, as he did four years ago. His "America Rising" theme is not a variation of "Morning in America."

It is a call to arms that is raw and angry, populist and pugnacious. It is a message that is as exhausting and is it confrontational. It is a message makes Al Gore's "people versus the powerful" seem tame and timid in comparison.

One Edwards supporter, departing after a big rally in Des Moines on Saturday night, said he hasn't heard a message as passionate or strong since Bobby Kennedy's 1968 presidential campaign.

Nice clothes aside, Edwards has turned street-fighter for the final stretch run. His message can be boiled down to a single word -- "Fight!" -- which he repeats over and over and over and over again: Fight. Fight. Fight. Fight.

Edwards has rolled out anecdotes he never used in the past to make it all the more personal. They conjure up images that hardly square with his slight frame and good looks. He was, as he now explains, a brawler as a kid, taking on bullies the way he later took on corporations and insurance companies as a trail lawyer.

"Like many of you, I had to fight to survive," he told an audience of nearly a thousand people on Saturday night. "I mean really. Literally."

He describes the southern mill town where he grew up as a tough little place and tells the story of getting into a fight one day with an older boy. "Got my butt kicked," he says. When he got home, his father offered a stern lesson in life.

"I don't ever want to hear, son, about you starting a fight," he says his father told him. "But you listen to me and listen to me clearly. I don't want to ever hear that you walked away from one. Because if you're not willing to stand up for yourself and if you're not willing to fight, no one will stand up for you."

The enemy he sees is corporate America and corporate greed. His message seeks not to unite America but to finish what he describes as "an epic struggle" against forces that are, literally, killing America -- destroying jobs, holding down wages, putting ordinary Americans out of work or denying them medical care.

snip

His language is over the top. He casts the challenges facing America in terms of morality and immorality. Speaking of tax policies that have encouraged companies to send jobs overseas, he says, "This is insanity -- I mean complete insanity."

The rich have an "iron-fisted grip" on democracy and won't let go through negotiations. "Anybody who suggests that we don't have an epic fight on our hands is living in Never-Never Land," he says.

For anyone who likes Edwards fighting stance and a chuckle.



Display:


Re: John Edwards: Street Fighter (2.00 / 4)

We can have a bare-knuckled political fight like the one JRE advocates, or, come 10-15 years, we can have real blood flowing in the streets.  When societal fractures become too deep, violent upheavel and radicalism become inevitable.  Not desirable, I emphasize, but look at socio-historical patterns.  What makes this country that much different from any other?  

Surely repealing Bush's tax cuts, establishing UHC, moving toward a green energy economy and putting an end to ruinous trade deals would be preferable to all (including the corporate structure).  


Take out the trash. Down with Saxby Chambliss!
by CLLGADEM on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 05:49:24 AM EST

Re: John Edwards: Street Fighter (2.00 / 3)

Great diary Cosbo!  :)

Can't go with hope and dope!

We need a Leader with SUBSTANCE - plans and solutions to move our country forward.
Go Edwards!


Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 01:08:23 PM EST

Thanks annefrank!! (2.00 / 1)

I miss you on dkos. When you coming back...huh, huh, huh. :-)

Happy New Years to you!


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 01:42:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He will be a great VP (1.00 / 1)

for someone. It's the VP who is supposed to be the "attack dog" while the President is supposed to stay above the fray. Edwards is a great attack dog.


by Mystylplx on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 01:08:54 PM EST

That's not going to happen. (2.00 / 1)

Also, he'll be fantastic president. He's got the fire and the policies that EVERYBODY else is copying. Why shouldn't we vote for the REAL DEAL!


It's an election, not an auction.
by cosbo on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 01:43:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (2.00 / 1)

As long as Republican Presidents keep behaving as aggressive partisans, and Democrats try to "stay above the fray," we're going to watch the country keep moving in the wrong direction.

If you're under the impression that Nixon, Reagan, Bush I and Bush II "stayed above the fray" of partisan politics then I must respectfully disagree with you.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 01:49:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (none / 0)

I don't think we should be modeling our ideal President on Nixon, Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. The next President will be a Democrat, why not show them how it's done instead of copying them?


by Mystylplx on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 02:48:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (none / 0)

So then, what you should have said was not "Presidents are supposed to stay above the fray" but "Democratic Presidents are supposed to stay above the fray."

Like I said in my first paragraph, the paradigm wherein Republicans are aggressive partisans and Democrats are expected to meet the other guys halfway has done nothing but move our country steadily to the right over the past three decades.

During the middle part of the last century, we had Democratic Presidents who weren't afraid to make enemies and define themselves by reference thereto, and we got an awful lot of progressive results as a consequence.  Thank God FDR didn't share your view of how a President is "supposed to behave."


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 02:57:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (none / 0)

Nope. I meant exactly what I said. Just because Republicans don't do it doesn't mean they shouldn't. And FDR was a very special case which is completely unlike the current situation. And even FDR, on January 6, 1941, said,

Our national policy is this :
  First, by an impressive expression of the public will and
  without regard to partisanship, we are committed to
  all-inclusive national defense.
  Second, by an impressive expression of the public will and
  without regard to partisanship, we are committed to full
  support of all those resolute people everywhere who are
  resisting aggression and are thereby keeping war away from
  our hemisphere.  By this support we express our
  determination that the democratic cause shall prevail, and
  we strengthen the defense and the security of our own
  nation.

 Third, by an impressive expression of the public will and
  without regard to partisanship, we are committed to the
  proposition that principle of morality and considerations
  for our own security will never permit us to acquiesce in a
  peace dictated by aggressors and sponsored by appeasers.  We
  know that enduring peace cannot be bought at the cost of
  other people's freedom.
  In the recent national election there was no substantial
  difference between the two great parties in respect to that
  national policy.


by Mystylplx on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 03:21:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (none / 0)

That's perhaps the worst historical example you could ever have come up with.  FDR was claiming the mantle of bipartisanship on the war because he had just won reelection against an opponent who spurned his own party and adopted FDR's position on the war.

If FDR hadn't held firm to his position on providing military support to the Allies, and had sought some bipartisan compromise with the isolationists merely because "a President is supposed to be above the fray," we might all be speaking German today.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 03:32:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He will be a great VP (none / 0)

"Above the fray" doesn't mean capitulation.


by Mystylplx on Mon Dec 31, 2007 at 03:41:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: John Edwards: Street Fighter (2.00 / 1)

thank you,please,please keep all the Edwards news coming. I pass it along to foreign media


by yann123 on Tue Jan 01, 2008 at 02:00:06 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.